We belong to the land
Landownership is as old as humanity. From tribal territorial disputes, to nuclear holocaust, humans have fought over land and its resources for thousands of years. The conflicts range from the petty garden fence dispute to centuries long diaspora and more wars than I can count. Despite all the suffering and horror that war is still bringing to people all over the world today, it doesn't look like we're about to stop engaging in fights over territorial control, taking it right to the ridiculous with the Maldivas in 1982.
You could state that on that kind of level, there's little ordinary people can do to stop war, as the massive protest marches against the war on Iraq sadly showed us, but the intolerant attitudes are not just the prerogative of governments, far from. It seems to me that in every one of us hides the Scrooge element, ready to shout: "Get off my land!" if experiences of travellers are anything to go by. For as long as they have existed, nomadic peoples have been at the receiving end of some of the most despicable treatment by the settled communities. It is utterly incomprehensible that those who live the lightest on the land, should be persecuted so. I've had a bit of a taste of the intolerant attitude that the public have towards itinerants. In my late teens and early twenties, I travelled around in the warmer parts of Europe and lived for a while in Gran Canaria in an unoffical hippy community, where we were fair game for the Guardia Civil. Not far from where I live in Wales, the people of The Piod near Rhayader were harrassed for many years before they were finally left to live on the land.
When I first met my husband, 20 years ago, he was a horse-drawn traveller. Although the vast majority of his memories and experiences of the travelling life are positive, he is not unfamiliar with more aggressive and prejudiced reactions from the public. He did get told more than once to move on from just a grassy verge of the road.
If the Thatcher years culminated in some of the worst treatment of travellers ever during the Battle of the Beanfield and the creation of the Criminal Justice Act, the current Tory government seem intent to do their bit by trying to criminalise squatting and by the hard line taken by Basildon Council against the travelling community of Dale Farm. The problem is not just that a tiny minority owns the vast majority of the land in Britain, it's that this minority are the ones who have the ear of or are those that have all the political power in the land. And they have absolutly no interest in land reform, as for the onerous task of owning all this land, they get fat payouts from you and me through the common agricultural policy. Seriously, how much more screwed up can it get?
I don't own any land, I don't even own a house. I've never felt entirely comfortable with the idea of landownership. We are all born onto this planet, should we not all have the use of some of it's surface space to live and create a livelihood, regardless of how wealthy or poor we are? How much conflict, inequality and suffering could be avoided if we changed our views on how we hold land; how much wealthier and happier we would all be. But, I suppose, we are closer in time to the Neanderthals where the guy with the biggest stick got the best land, than we are to giving up on owning land and admitting that in truth; we belong to the land. On that subject, Australian Aborigines are much more evolved than us; in their traditional culture, they have no concept of landownership.
So where does Transition fit into this? How can transitionistas make a difference? Well, it's very easy, yet most of you will find it hard: If you own land and you do not use all of it, you can share your land with those who do not have any. If you don't own land, find a landowner and see if they are willing to share. Time to walk your talk! I guess of those that read this blog, the landless ones might agree with me, whereas those with land will find a lot of reasons to disagree. It has always been thus.
Photo's: Dale Farm resident holding up a crucifix aginst a backdrop of burning barricades/ John and Jean parked up near Rhayader, from left to right: Jean, Merlin, Magic/ Squatters protest/ John and Magic going down the road
Video link
Themes
- Login or register to post comments
- del.icio.us

Great blog!
13 December 2011 - 2:51pm — Joe RakeThis is a really great blog! I really enjoyed reading it. I also dislike property rights.
Great!
14 December 2011 - 2:36pm — Justin KenrickThis post is really helpful, as was Joe's ("0.3% own 67% of the land" makes your blood boil) post!
In one sense land ownership is as old a humanity, but as you point out "Australian Aborigines . . . in their traditional culture, they have no concept of landownership" and there are many others like them. It's not that there is no sense of who is responsible for what land - that is pretty well always very clear; but the key point is that you are welcome onto that land if you respect the land and what is needed to ensure its well-being, and you are not welcome if you don't. Surely a far saner way of deciding who has rights to what than basing it on who took what by force however many centuries ago!
As Dougie Maclean says in
15 December 2011 - 11:01am — John MasonAs Dougie Maclean says in "Solid Ground", "You cannot own the land. The land owns you".
Great piece, Ann :)
Cheers - John
land ownership
7 January 2012 - 10:35am — Carlo CastellaniI understood you don't like land ownership, but didn't understand what you like; how land should be managed. Nomadic people have been displaced by sedentary people because the latter have growingly outnumbered the former. The same amount of land can sustain nomads (hunters/gatherers/herders) versus farmers with a ratio of 1/100. Whatever the amount of people supposed to inhabit this planet I reject the nomadic way of life because of its devastating impact on ecosystems and constant state of warfare. Even remaing examples within industrial societies, gypsies, are an example of disregard towards social life and the environment.
Greetings Carlo
9 January 2012 - 8:42am — Justin KenrickHi Carlo, have a look at some of the literature on nomadic people and you'll see that describing them as having a "devastating impact on ecosystems" and being in a "constant state of warfare" is simply mistaken - though both of these accusations are still often used by more powerful forces as justifications for stealing their land and denying them basic human rights. Nomadic people tend to have a very clear idea of what land they have the right to use based on historical and seasonal use. As for the idea that "gypsies, are an example of disregard towards social life and the environment", think of Gypsies parked up in caravans and vans by the side of a motorway - which is causing more damage: the few Gypsies parked up or the millions of drivers driving past? As for their social life, I don't see how you can suggest they have a disregard towards theirs (I don't understand what that would mean) - Have a look at Judith Okely's 'The Traveller-Gypsies'
Greetings Carlo
9 January 2012 - 8:42am — Justin KenrickHi Carlo, have a look at some of the literature on nomadic people and you'll see that describing them as having a "devastating impact on ecosystems" and being in a "constant state of warfare" is simply mistaken - though both of these accusations are still often used by more powerful forces as justifications for stealing their land and denying them basic human rights. Nomadic people tend to have a very clear idea of what land they have the right to use based on historical and seasonal use. As for the idea that "gypsies, are an example of disregard towards social life and the environment", think of Gypsies parked up in caravans and vans by the side of a motorway - which is causing more damage: the few Gypsies parked up or the millions of drivers driving past? As for their social life, I don't see how you can suggest they have a disregard towards theirs (I don't understand what that would mean) - Have a look at Judith Okely's 'The Traveller-Gypsies'