Skip to Main Content

Louis Alemayehu: Some thoughts on diversity, leadership and patience in Transition

Proposed purpose statement:  "Transition Network supports community-led responses to climate change, inequality and shrinking supplies of cheap energy, building resilience and happiness.”

Who proposed this and why

 

By Louis Alemayehu, Transition Minnesota, Transition US Trainer

Authentic help means that all who are involved help each other mutually, growing together in the common effort to understand the reality that they seek to transform.
-    Paulo Friere, Brazilian popular educator

I must own up to something at the start of this: I have a bias. I have an agenda.  I am not impartial.  I see things through a complicated lens of culture, class, and gender.  I am a mature male of African, Native American and European heritage, a son of the Americas.  I decided at an early age that all of that, despite what was happening in the outside world, would be at peace with me.

I live in the Borderlands/La Frontera, as described by Gloria Anzaldua. In Borderlands, Anzaldua describes this as a state of transition, of ambivalence, of conflict; someone who is infused with many cultures yet cannot claim a single one wholly for oneself.  I don't personally feel so conflicted about my complexity.  I see things through some amalgam of African, Native American and Buddhist teachings with some blind spots too. I have had several feminist mentors.  At this stage of my life, I am pretty synthesized, but not homogenized!  Rather, I am whole and complete and ready to live the role of elder to multiple communities with a world unfolding before my eyes that hopefully flows from a collective heart, yearning for the manifestation of a peaceable land.

In 2001, a group of environmentalists who were First Nation and People of Color began to have rather intense dialogs about a larger environmental movement in which they felt they had no authentic voice.  Some of us had been involved in the creation of the principles of Environmental Justice, which acknowledges that poor people, Indigenous Peoples, and People of Color are paying a higher price in the environmental crisis.  For example, the least expensive housing is often located in the most toxic areas of our environment.  Rather than be victimized by the principles of "divide and conquer", we found unique ways to stay rooted in our culture and sounded a collective voice that to this day is still calling.

In 2003, we put together something called "Earth Summit: The Making of Family".  We had a powerful meeting with nutritious food, art and cultural sharing and vigorous open forums that were sometimes painful.  We went back to our respective communities to work on environmental justice within our own cultural context, but taking the unique step extending invitations to one another to be on each other's boards or to be in mentor/mentee relationships.  Several organizations emerged during this time, including Ce Tempoxcalli, the Women's Environmental Institute, Afro-Eco, Environmental Justice Advocates of Minnesota and the veteran of them all, the North American Water Office.

Soon I began to hear about people organizing within the rapidly growing Transition Towns.  As I got involved in their dialogues and training paradigms, I slowing realized that we, in Minnesota, particularly Indigenous peoples and people of color, had been essentially been doing Transitions relevant work for well over a decade.  We are now poised to develop working relationships nationally and internationally with those doing the work of creating the new communities, the new way of being in harmony with Mother Earth, a new culture. 

Permaculture, for us, is the reclamation of our cultural roots, of indigenous ways.  The awful truth that still yearns for healing is that the attack upon Mother Earth also parallels the attack upon our cultures, our homelands around the globe.  The Industrial Revolution required the domination and rape of our homelands. The natural resources that feed the machinery of the modern industrial world were not used the way the West used them. Oil was the blood of our Mother Earth.  It mostly was left where it was to keep things in balance.  Our prayer now is that we will all experience The Global Village as conscious relatives with a respect for all life.

My first encounter with formal Transition Towns facilitators was not pleasant, but I must add that they didn’t find me particularly pleasant either.  We have since had positive interaction.  Let me explain.  My first Training for Transition experience was made up of about 40 participants.  About 10 to 12 of us were Indigenous or people of color.  I noticed at the beginning that some of the people of color were asking questions to try and get a handle on what this was all about.  I could be wrong, but I believe the facilitators thought we should have arrived already knowing about what is referred to as the Transitions movement and jump in ready to go.  We could recognize a good idea when we saw one, but we also recognize that no people of color seemed to share leadership in this “movement”.   The silent unasked questions in our heads where something like: So how do you do business here? What do you want from me or my community?   Who has the power here?  Where do I fit in Transition Towns?  I know how things work in the real world, so is this more of the same?

At the end of the 2-day workshop I realized from a conversation with the trainers that they understood our questions to be a challenge, if not out and out negation of their authority or leadership, an insult.  It seems to me that the Transitions paradigm puts a lot of emphasis on “getting through the material” and sometimes that urgency can get in the way of allowing time for people to digest the content and begin to figure out what it all means initially.  It seems like concern about time can undermine an experiential model of learning or not take into account a diversity of learning styles or channels.  Open Space activities did help people be fully present.

When a teacher approaches a learning experience as though teacher is not also a student, the learning experience is diminished.  The teacher should take cues from the students individually and collectively to know how to effectively proceed from one lesson to the next.  What knowledge does the student bring into the classroom from his or her lived experience that can enrich the lessons taught?  If the learning environment always has European heritage people with no experience communicating across class and culture in the position of authority, a much needed global movement to create a new culture that all of us claim will not be possible.  And I am very clear that the challenges we face now environmentally, socially, politically, economically or spiritually cannot be met in isolation from one another. 

We need to admit that most of us were not acculturated to build community beyond whatever identity we were taught was ours.  We tend to see the world through lenses of “us and them”; my country vs. your country; my religion vs. your religion; my futball team vs. your football team, rah, rah bravery, manhood, patriotism, etc. etc.  Loving our country more than the Earth that cradles all of those national locations roots us in a profoundly false consciousness, a dangerous fairytale-view of reality and we all fall down.

There is something brilliant about Richard Heinberg’s 300 Years of FOSSIL FUELS in 300 Seconds.  But what if you use it as a teaching tool to a group of people who are not all middle class people of European heritage?  One thing you would have told them unintentionally is that they don’t exist, that their history is expendable for the sake of saving time via abbreviation.  Really?  How can I trust your judgment about things that matter to my existence?  How many wars have been fought? How many people have died? How much land has been stolen/colonized in order to fuel the Industrial Revolution?  What does the Ulster Plantation tell us about the plantations that arose in the Americas? And let us not forget that the Irish and the Welsh paid a price in their homelands that became a part of the British Empire and their descendents continue to pay a price upon land stolen from the American Indians called Appalachia.

“So let’s not speak falsely now, the hour is getting late”.  Wherever we are going, we will probably all be going together.  Fukishima actually happened to all of us psychologically, spiritually and physically.  It is one world, the wind blows, and the water flows.  We are all touched by the elements.  What we do the earth, water and air we do to ourselves, to one another.  Our fragmented mentalities create the fragmented, violent world we live within.  If we intend to build an authentic movement that speaks across the “boundaries” of nation, class, “race”, gender and culture, we must create learning environments where to one degree or another we are prepared to share our knowledge and be changed by what we learn from others.   The common ground is sacred space that must be cared about and cared for.

There is a need to reclaim our authentic history(ies) and traditional cultural Earth-based wisdom(s) so that we can learn to greet one another as relatives as we live in the Global Village.  We must name the realities of inequality and understand what a balance of equity might actually be.  We are not “all the same”, but there need not be fear about our differences.  There is a way that our differences can be the foundation of a life sustaining unity of vision, purpose and a functional wisdom that appreciates this gift of Mother Earth we are all dependent upon and accountable to.  One way or another, this is Transformation Day.  The world is literally in our hands.   The New World is in our hands, fashioned from the old ways and our renewal of imagination, a rebirth of wonder.  There will be conflict, but conflict can be way to build community and transform our environment.  Conflicts hold a wisdom that is waiting to be revealed.  Courage is the key to the wisdom than can heal what is wounded, broken and weary.

                          We are here to awaken from the illusion of our separateness.
                                                            Thich Naht Hanh

 

Comments

Ann Owen's picture

Teacher and student are one and the same

Hi Louis,

Felt very moved by your post and also recognise the issues your bring up re the teacher/learner relationship. As a transition trainer of the UK pool of trainers, I welcome challenges from the participants of any courses that I facillitate, precisely because they are such valuable learning opportunities, both for me, the "teacher" and the "learner", if their is such a division at all. The challenge here, for me, is to go beyond all the differences we might have to where we are all just human beings living on one planet, trying our best to find ways to cope with the predicament we find ourselves in. I love the richness and diversity I encounter during the trainings, all the more perspectives to look at the issues with and if that seems at times overwhelmingly complex, it has never been a problem, unless there was some wellmeant, but sadly foolish attempt to "control" it all.

I wish I could have some really long conversations with you, so far accross the oceans, as I can imagine there would be a lot to learn...

sylvia rose's picture

"communicating across class and culture"

Hi Louis,

Thanks for saying a lot that in my opinion needs saying. I agree that we can't / won't move to a place of ultimate equality (as Ann is hoping) without first acknowledging the inequalities that exist and the subtle and not-so-subtle power structures that keep them in place. And we won't move beyond a Euro-centric model of training and organising until we of European heritage firstly acknowledge that we need to, and secondly start start acquiring some skills in how to.

Which is not always easy. 

Doly Garcia's picture

My experience with Transition

My experience with Transition hasn't been positive, either. And I feel it has something to do with equality, but something a bit more complex than people discriminating others on the base of origin or culture.

I'm pretty familiar with discrimination. I was born in Spain, and my parents moved a lot. Most of Spain at the time was prejudiced against people who weren't born in the same area, and against women. I was both. Things have changed since, but I know exactly what it's like to be excluded for no good reason.

When I moved to England, I was pleased to discover that none of those things were a problem. There were of course cultural differences. My approach to people is very blunt and frank by English standards, but I found that most English people are willing to make allowances for my different background. If anything, sometimes I felt some positive discrimination, people being extra sensitive and double-checking if I might take offence for things that hadn't offended me at all.

But within Transition Brighton & Hove, for the first time in many years, I felt discriminated again. At the beginning I just thought that some people's behaviour was quite surprising, I couldn't make sense of it. It eventually dawned on me that it was exactly like prejudice. I was being deliberately left out of things and marked as "do not touch". I'm sure that part of it was a reaction against my bluntness, but I don't think that was the whole story, because I've had brushes about it with other English people, in other places, before, during and after being involved in Transition, and it's never gone beyond both sides learning to make adjustments.

I think the reason this time was different is that this time, some people had a very clear sense of "us" and "them". "Us" was greenies, the longest involvement the better. One particular person used to boast about his grandparents already being involved in proto-ecological activities. "Them" was the unenlightened people that didn't know about sustainability yet, that should be lovingly taught but in any case their opinions couldn't be totally respected because they didn't know yet the True Way. I was clearly one of "them" because my involvement in green issues was fairly recent. And I had the temerity of believing that I could do better in some things than some of the "oldies". That was unacceptable. I was there to receive the wisdom from the old ones, and to provide my input for consultation. But that wasn't enough, I wanted more than that. I wanted to be treated as an equal, and that's something they weren't willing to do. Of course, they believed they were being rather fair and reasonable, as it often happens with prejudiced people.

I'm sure that another factor that didn't help is that, being no stranger to discrimination, I'm more willing than most to accept people that others find difficult. Several members in my group have what can only be described as minor mental health issues. They are able to function reasonably well, but they aren't the easiest people to get along with. One has Aspergers, another is a borderline personality, another was abused during childhood, another has some mild psycopathic traits. In layman's terms, one is a bit robotic, another is a drama queen, another has trouble with authority and rules, and another is a bit of a selfish snake. But we can all work together, provided that things are made very clear - and I don't have any trouble at all spelling out the hows and the whys and what will happen exactly if things go wrong. But those that were "there before" claimed that the five of us, clearly, were incapable of working in harmony with other people and were the problem. In spite of the evident fact that we were doing exactly that, and working with other perfectly nice and normal people within the Energy Group as well.

Eventually there was talk of a split. And to my dismay, the discrimination seemed to be going all the way up to the Transition Network! The automatic assumption from the top was that, of the two groups that were roughly the same size, the one led by the "oldies" that went to Transition conferences and the like was the core Transition. I challenged that, asking what criteria they had to decide whether something was a Transition initiative or not, and we'd see if both groups, only one, or neither, fulfilled the criteria, but no answer came forward.

To wrap up, I entirely agree with the idea that equality should be somewhere in the purpose statement, but I think it should be in a different place. I'd put it here: “Transition Network supports community-led responses to climate change and shrinking supplies of cheap energy, building resilience, equality and happiness.”

The reason I'm proposing that is that if equality goes at the beginning, that could just create another group of people, the ones that have worked in the past around inequality, that comes into Transition initiatives and form their own separate tribe within the initiative, their own "us" and "them". I've seen too much tribal thinking around specific ideologies already within Transition initiatives, and I wouldn't like to see more of that. I'd like to emphasize that the goals are common, but there are several possible means to achieve them.